MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404213026 · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100527

Levels, sources and toxicity assessment of PCBs in surface and groundwater in Nigeria: A systematic review

2024· review· en· W4404213026 on OpenAlex
Chiedozie C. Aralu, Kelvin Emeka Agbo, Nchekwube D. Nweke, Stanley Ugochukwu Nwoke, Arikpo Temple Okah, Hillary Onyeka Abugu, Johnbosco C. Egbueri, Johnson C. Agbasi, Arinze Longinus Ezugwu, Michael E. Omeka, Ifeanyi Adolphus Ucheana

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hazardous Materials Advances · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterToxicityEnvironmental scienceSurface waterEnvironmental chemistryGeologyEnvironmental engineeringMedicineChemistryInternal medicineGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Anthropogenic activities such as the use unsanitary dumpsites, oil spillage, and effluents are major sources of PCBs to the environment. • PCBs are toxic organic compounds which can pollute the ground and surface water bodies. • Pollution of the water bodies can lead to cancer and non-cancer health threats. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which are produced by human activity, have contaminated Nigeria's ecology as a result of its industrialization for economic development. Organic compounds such as PCBs, are hazardous substances that provide significant health and environmental dangers. This study investigated the levels of PCBs in Nigerian ground and surface water, as well as their origins and associated health risks. A suitable screening process was used to gather and evaluate previous works from research databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and Scopus. Both high and low quantities of PCBs were discovered in the research, and these findings pose an adverse effect on public health. The ground and surface water values ranged from below detectable limit (BDL) –560 µg/L and BDL–56.25 µg/L, respectively. Furthermore, transformer failures and oil spills were connected to the PCB sources. Additionally, leachates from waste sites, transformer oil, untreated effluent discharge, and petroleum spills were identified as the sources of PCBs. Through ingesting exposure routes to people, the cancer risk assessment values of PCBs in the water showed low to high-risk levels. Except for a single study, the non-carcinogenic risk's hazard index (HI) values showed no danger. It is advised that appropriate oversight, education, and stringent adherence to legal regulations be put in place to stop this hazardous substance from contaminating water and other environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it