MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404214962 · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2024.11.004

Early-Onset Trajectories of Emotional Dysregulation in Autistic Children

2024· article· en· W4404214962 on OpenAlexafffund
Teresa Bennett, Marc Jambon, Anat Zaidman‐Zait, Eric Duku, Stelios Georgiades, Mayada Elsabbagh, Isabel M. Smith, Tracy Vaillancourt, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Connor M. Kerns, Annie Richard, Rachael Bedford, Péter Szatmári

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaWilfrid Laurier University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcMaster UniversityAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsSinneave Family FoundationAutism Speaks
KeywordsEmotional dysregulationPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Emotional dysregulation (ED) is a common and debilitating problem for autistic children and their families. However, little is known about early-onset patterns of dysregulation, associated risk factors, and child and family outcomes. This study aimed to characterize trajectories of ED in an inception cohort of autistic preschoolers. METHOD: Caregivers reported on ED of 396 autistic children using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability and Hyperactivity/Noncompliance subscales at 6 time points from shortly after autism spectrum disorder diagnosis (ages 2-4 years) to preadolescence (ages 10-11 years). Covariance pattern mixture modeling was used to characterize the number and shape of latent dysregulation trajectories that best fit underlying data. Child and family correlates were measured at baseline and between ages 10 and 11 years to characterize early risk factors and preadolescent profiles associated with distinct latent trajectories. RESULTS: Three distinct trajectory classes best fit the data: persistently self-regulated (18% of sample), moderate and declining (54%), and persistently dysregulated (28%). Children classified in the persistently dysregulated trajectory lived with more depressed caregivers and in families reporting greater relationship problems and lower household incomes compared with children in lower-risk trajectories. Few associations were found with baseline child characteristics. Persistent dysregulation problems were associated with significantly worse child mental health and functional outcomes during preadolescent years. CONCLUSION: Risk of persistent severe ED may be identifiable at the time of early autism diagnosis. Diagnostic assessments should include contextual risk factors and links to evidence-based family supports and interventions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Emotional dysregulation, in the form of frequent and severe meltdowns, irritability and impulsivity, often cause a lot of stress for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their families. Using data from the Pathways in ASD follow-up study involving 396 children diagnosed between the ages of 2 and 4 years with ASD, authors found that 28% were at high risk of severe emotional dysregulation that lasted throughout early and middle childhood. Children at highest risk were more likely to live in homes where families experienced parental depression, family relationship stress, and lower household incomes compared to those with fewer self-regulation problems. Clinicians conducting diagnostic assessments should include proactive and family-centered mental health assessments, prevention and early intervention for young children with ASD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent PsychiatrySame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207