Predicting tumour resistance to paclitaxel and carboplatin utilising genome‐wide screening in haploid human embryonic stem cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taxanes and platinum molecules, specifically paclitaxel and carboplatin, are widely used anticancer drugs that induce cell death and serve as first-line chemotherapy for various cancer types. Despite the efficient effect of both drugs on cancer cell proliferation, many tumours have innate resistance against paclitaxel and carboplatin, which leads to inefficient treatment and poor survival rates. Haploid human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are a novel and robust platform for genetic screening. To gain a comprehensive view of genes that affect or regulate paclitaxel and carboplatin resistance, genome-wide loss-of-function screens in haploid hESCs were performed. Both paclitaxel and carboplatin screens have yielded selected plausible gene lists and pathways relevant to resistance prediction. The effects of mutations in selected genes on the resistance to the drugs were demonstrated. Based on the results, an algorithm that can predict resistance to paclitaxel or carboplatin was developed. Applying the algorithm to the DNA mutation profile of patients' tumours enabled the separation of sensitive versus resistant patients, thus, providing a prediction tool. As the anticancer drugs arsenal can offer alternatives in case of resistance to either paclitaxel or carboplatin, an early prediction can provide a significant advantage and should improve treatment. The algorithm assists this unmet need and helps predict whether a patient will respond to the treatment and may have an immediate clinically actionable application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".