MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404216920 · doi:10.21037/apm-24-90

A narrative review of the challenges and impact of breast cancer treatment in older adults beyond cancer diagnosis

2024· review· en· W4404216920 on OpenAlexaff
W. Sung, Kritika Sharma, Adrian Wai Chan, Muna Al Khaifi, Eva Oldenburger, Elizabeth Chuk

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerBreast cancerNarrative reviewNarrativeOncologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide, with 45% of them over 65 years old. Older breast cancer patients tend to be underrepresented and understudied in major clinical trials. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding treatment decision-making, treatment toxicities, and proposed survivorship management recommendations for geriatric cancer patients. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar. The search strategy included a combination of keywords related to clinical management and treatment toxicities of older cancer breast cancer patients. English articles published between May 1990 to May 2024 were included. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Older breast cancer patients represent a heterogeneous group with specific needs and treatment considerations. Treatment decisions for geriatric cancer patients should be based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), which considers the patient's functional status, comorbidities, and preferences, rather than relying solely on chronological age. Breast cancer surgery is generally well tolerated in older patients, with a low rate of systemic complications and 30-day post-surgery mortality. In selected elderly patients, axillary surgery may be omitted to minimize side effects. The choice of endocrine therapy should take into account the side effect profile, patient's comorbidities, concomitant medications, and preferences. While aromatase inhibitors provide better efficacy, musculoskeletal side effects and osteoporosis may be a concern for older patients. CDK4/6 inhibitors have a similar efficacy in elderly patients as younger patients, but the incidence of neutropenia and dose modifications or interruptions are more frequent. Reported radiotherapy side effects are similar across age groups, although the occurrence of radiation-induced pulmonary toxicities was found to be associated with old age. Chemotherapy is reserved for triple-negative and HER2-positive disease in elderly patients due to known side effects. such as neutropenia, cardiotoxicity, and cognitive impairment. Data on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy use in older patients are limited. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should make additional efforts to evaluate age-specific treatment efficacy and treatment-induced toxicities. Further efforts to enhance the representation of older patients in breast cancer trials are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesFrench-language works237,207