MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404218282 · doi:10.3389/frdem.2024.1408782

A scoping review of magnetic resonance angiography and perfusion image synthesis

2024· review· en· W4404218282 on OpenAlexafffund
Rémi Lamontagne‐Caron, Simon Duchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Dementia · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingPerfusionMagnetic resonance angiographyRadiologyAngiographyNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Deregulation of the cerebrovascular system has been linked to neurodegeneration, part of a putative causal pathway into etiologies such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). In medical imaging, time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) and perfusion MRI are the most common modalities used to study this system. However, due to lack of resources, many large-scale studies of AD are not acquiring these images; this creates a conundrum, as the lack of evidence limits our knowledge of the interaction between the cerebrovascular system and AD. Deep learning approaches have been used in recent developments to generate synthetic medical images from existing contrasts. In this review, we study the use of artificial intelligence in the generation of synthetic TOF-MRA and perfusion-related images from existing neuroanatomical and neurovascular acquisitions for the study of the cerebrovascular system. Method: Following the PRISMA reporting guidelines we conducted a scoping review of 729 studies relating to image synthesis of TOF-MRA or perfusion imaging, from which 13 met our criteria. Results: Studies showed that T1-w, T2-w, and FLAIR can be used to synthesize perfusion map and TOF-MRA. Other studies demonstrated that synthetic images could have a greater signal-to-noise ratio compared to real images and that some models trained on healthy subjects could generalize their outputs to an unseen population, such as stroke patients. Discussion: These findings suggest that generating TOF-MRA and perfusion MRI images holds significant potential for enhancing neurovascular studies, particularly in cases where direct acquisition is not feasible. This approach could provide valuable insights for retrospective studies of several cerebrovascular related diseases such as stroke and AD. While promising, further research is needed to assess their sensitivity and specificity, and ensure their applicability across diverse populations. The use of models to generate TOF-MRA and perfusion MRI using commonly acquired data could be the key for the retrospective study of the cerebrovascular system and elucidate its role in the development of dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in DementiaSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207