A multichannel graph neural network based on multisimilarity modality hypergraph contrastive learning for predicting unknown types of cancer biomarkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying potential cancer biomarkers is a key task in biomedical research, providing a promising avenue for the diagnosis and treatment of human tumors and cancers. In recent years, several machine learning-based RNA-disease association prediction techniques have emerged. However, they primarily focus on modeling relationships of a single type, overlooking the importance of gaining insights into molecular behaviors from a complete regulatory network perspective and discovering biomarkers of unknown types. Furthermore, effectively handling local and global topological structural information of nodes in biological molecular regulatory graphs remains a challenge to improving biomarker prediction performance. To address these limitations, we propose a multichannel graph neural network based on multisimilarity modality hypergraph contrastive learning (MML-MGNN) for predicting unknown types of cancer biomarkers. MML-MGNN leverages multisimilarity modality hypergraph contrastive learning to delve into local associations in the regulatory network, learning diverse insights into the topological structures of multiple types of similarities, and then globally modeling the multisimilarity modalities through a multichannel graph autoencoder. By combining representations obtained from local-level associations and global-level regulatory graphs, MML-MGNN can acquire molecular feature descriptors benefiting from multitype association properties and the complete regulatory network. Experimental results on predicting three different types of cancer biomarkers demonstrate the outstanding performance of MML-MGNN. Furthermore, a case study on gastric cancer underscores the outstanding ability of MML-MGNN to gain deeper insights into molecular mechanisms in regulatory networks and prominent potential in cancer biomarker prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".