MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404227285 · doi:10.7202/1113061ar

<i>Si mis dedos tocan los tuyos</i>

2022· article· fr· W4404227285 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFeminism, Gender, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer securityInternet privacyBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte explore le concept de recherche-création (RC) en tant que catégorie émergente de production de connaissances dans les sciences sociales, les sciences humaines et les arts, ainsi que les défis qui y sont associés. Il ambitionne également d’examiner le potentiel d’une méthodologie collaborative (la création d’un court-métrage dans le cadre du projet interdisciplinaire TRYSPACES) de recherche-création pour répondre à trois défis et paradoxes relevés dans la littérature, à savoir les paradoxes associés au contexte, au processus et à la connaissance. Ces trois niveaux sont mis en correspondance avec le récit de l’expérience et une réflexion sur les apprentissages (sensibles et communautaires) pour mettre en lumière les contributions et avancer vers de nouveaux paradigmes de construction et de diffusion des connaissances au sein de la recherche-création.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.401
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it