MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404228895 · doi:10.1111/his.15364

Neuroendocrine differentiation and serotonin expression in oesophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy: correlation with clinicopathological features and outcome

2024· article· en· W4404228895 on OpenAlexafffund
David W. Dodington, Stefano Serra, Tim Bracey, Runjan Chetty

Bibliographic record

VenueHistopathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersPhysicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
KeywordsNeoadjuvant therapyInternal medicineSerotoninCorrelationMedicineImmunohistochemistryAdenocarcinomaOncologyNeuroendocrine differentiationPathologyCancerReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a glandular or mucinous epithelial malignancy that can show immunohistochemical evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) and express the hormone serotonin. The objective of this study was to correlate the presence of NED and serotonin with clinicopathological characteristics and patient outcome after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort of patients treated between 2002 and 2021 was established and included 218 oesophagectomy specimens with residual tumour. Representative full-face sections of tumour were stained for synaptophysin, chromogranin-A and serotonin by immunohistochemistry, and staining results were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 129 (59%) tumours showed evidence of NED, defined as immunohistochemical expression of synaptophysin or chromogranin-A, while 40 (18%) showed evidence of NED and expressed serotonin. Patients with neuroendocrine-positive tumours had significantly shorter median OS compared to those with neuroendocrine-negative tumours (22.5 versus 48.8 months, P = 0.006), but similar median DFS (13.3 versus 17.8 months, P = 0.34). Using Cox regression, the association between NED and OS was significant in univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.45] and multivariate (HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.08-2.52) analysis. Patients with serotonin-expressing tumours had similar median OS (21.7 versus 25.9 months, P = 0.24) and DFS (7.3 versus 15.6 months, P = 0.12) compared to those with NED but lacking serotonin. Using Cox regression, serotonin expression was associated with reduced OS in univariate (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.06-2.47) but not multivariate (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.64-1.65) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support NED as independent predictor of OS in EAC after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. While a subset of tumours with NED expressed serotonin, this did not provide additional prognostic information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistopathologySame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207