MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404229205 · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2024.10.011

The Drosophila adult midgut progenitor cells arise from asymmetric divisions of neuroblast-like cells

2024· article· en· W4404229205 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew T Plygawko, Camille Stephan‐Otto Attolini, Ioanna Pitsidianaki, David P. Cook, Alistair C. Darby, Kyra Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Cell · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyNeuroblastMidgutCell biologyProgenitor cellDrosophila (subgenus)ProgenitorStem cellGeneticsNeurogenesisBotanyGeneLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Drosophila adult midgut progenitor cells (AMPs) give rise to all cells in the adult midgut epithelium, including the intestinal stem cells (ISCs). While they share many characteristics with the ISCs, it remains unclear how they are generated in the early embryo. Here, we show that they arise from a population of endoderm cells, which exhibit multiple similarities with Drosophila neuroblasts. These cells, which we have termed endoblasts, are patterned by homothorax (Hth) and undergo asymmetric divisions using the same molecular machinery as neuroblasts. We also show that the conservation of this molecular machinery extends to the generation of the enteroendocrine lineages. Parallels have previously been drawn between the pupal ISCs and larval neuroblasts. Our results suggest that these commonalities exist from the earliest stages of specification of progenitor cells of the intestinal and nervous systems and may represent an ancestral pathway for multipotent progenitor cell specification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental CellSame topicInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsFrench-language works237,207