MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404231770 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000209944

Association of Initial Side of Brain Atrophy With Clinical Features and Disease Progression in Patients With <i>GRN</i> Frontotemporal Dementia

2024· article· en· W4404231770 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sergi Borrego‐Écija, Jordi Juncà‐Parella, Marijne Vandebergh, Agnès Pérez‐Millan, Mircea Balasa, Albert Lladó, Arabella Bouzigues, Lucy L. Russell, Phoebe H. Foster, Eve Ferry‐Bolder, John C. van Swieten, Lize C. Jiskoot, Harro Seelaar, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Daniela Galimberti, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Pietro Tiraboschi, Isabel Santana, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Sandro Sorbi, Markus Otto, Florence Pasquier, Simon Ducharme, Christopher Butler, Isabelle Le Ber, Elizabeth Finger, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Mario Masellis, James B. Rowe, Matthis Synofzik, Fermín Moreno, Barbara Borroni, Rosa Rademakers, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Raquel Sánchez‐Valle

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilStichting DioraphteStockholms Läns LandstingUK Dementia Research InstituteMinistero della SaluteUniversity College LondonInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIZonMwBrain Research TrustWellcome TrustNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAlzheimer's SocietyNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAlzheimer NederlandEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWeston Brain InstituteFundación BBVA
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaAtrophyMedicineDementiaAssociation (psychology)DiseaseNeurosciencePathologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives Pathogenic variants in the GRN gene cause frontotemporal dementia (FTD- GRN ) with marked brain asymmetry. This study aims to assess whether the disease progression of FTD- GRN depends on the initial side of the atrophy. We also investigated the potential use of brain asymmetry as a biomarker of the disease. Methods Retrospective examination of data from the prospective Genetic Frontotemporal Initiative (GENFI) cohort study that recruits individuals who carry or were at risk of carrying a pathogenic variant causing FTD. GENFI participants underwent a standardized clinical and neuropsychological assessment, MRI, and a blood sample test yearly. We generated an asymmetry index for brain MRI to characterize brain asymmetry in participants with or at risk of FTD- GRN . Depending on the side of the asymmetry, we classified symptomatic GRN patients as right- GRN or left- GRN and compared their clinical features and disease progression. We generated generalized additive models to study how the asymmetry index evolves in carriers and noncarriers and compare its models with others created with volumetric values and plasma neurofilament light chain. Results A total of 399 participants (mean age 49.7 years, 59% female) were included (63 symptomatic carriers, 177 presymptomatic carriers, and 159 noncarriers). Symptomatic carriers showed higher brain asymmetry (11.6) than noncarriers (1.0, p < 0.001) and presymptomatic carriers (1.0, p < 0.001), making it possible to classify most of them as right- GRN (n = 21) or left- GRN (n = 36). Patients with right- GRN showed more disease severity at baseline ( β = 6.9, 95% CI 2.4–11.0, p = 0.003) but a lower deterioration by year ( β = −1.5, 95% CI −2.7 to −0.31, p = 0.015) than patients with left- GRN . Brain asymmetry could be found in GRN carriers 10.4 years before the onset of the symptoms (standard difference 0.85, CI 0.01–1.68). Discussion FTD- GRN affects the brain hemispheres asymmetrically and causes 2 anatomical asymmetry patterns depending on the side of the disease onset. We demonstrated that these 2 anatomical asymmetry patterns present different symptoms, severity at the time of the first visit, and different disease courses. Our results also suggest brain asymmetry as a possible biomarker of conversion in GRN carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207