MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404231872 · doi:10.52086/001c.125266

TEXT Reviews October 2024

2024· article· en· W4404231872 on OpenAlexaff
Gemma Parker, Hazel Smith, Andrew Leggett, Nathan Shepherdson, Dominique Hecq, Owen Bullock, Stephen McInerney, Jill Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueTEXT · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsCampion College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gemma Parker reviews David McCooey’s The Book of Falling ; Hazel Smith reviews Jessica Luck Lewis’s Poetics of Cognition: Thinking through experimental poems ; Andrew Leggett reviews Peter Goldsworthy’s The Cancer Finishing School ; Nathan Shepherdson reviews Jill Jones’s Acrobat Music: New & Selected Poems ; Dominique Hecq reviews Jen Webb’s The Daily News ; Owen Bullock reviews The Routledge Global Haiku Reader (edited by James Shea and Grant Caldwell); Stephen McInerney reviews Jakob Ziguras’s Venetian Mirrors ; and Jill Jones reviews Hazel Smith’s Ecliptical .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTEXTSame topicPoetry Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207