Gastric Schwannoma: A Rare Cause of Gastric Bleeding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gastric schwannomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are two types of mesenchymal tumors, which represent a group of rare tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The differential diagnosis between these two tumors is difficult given their very similar appearance and clinical features. The authors present a case of a 63-year-old man with melena and epigastric pain. An upper digestive endoscopy was performed, revealing an ulcerated gastric subepithelial lesion suspected to be a GIST. Further imaging with a computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a well-defined hypodense solid nodular mass, with homogeneous enhancement, measuring 22 × 18 mm, on the anterior wall of the transition between the body and gastric antrum, situated within the submucosal layer. The patient subsequently underwent a laparoscopic atypical gastrectomy, which proceeded without complications. The pathological examination of the excised lesion confirmed it to be a gastric schwannoma, with complete excision. This case report illustrates a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding, that requires immediate action, and en bloc resection is usually curative. Given the excellent prognosis after complete resection, a correct diagnosis is essential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".