‘I am rooted, but I flow’:<i>Écriture Fluide</i>, Becoming, and Healing in Kim de l’Horizon’s<i>Blutbuch</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the Swiss writer Kim de l’Horizon, writing is a political act that seeks to heal the wounds caused by the constraints of gender identities and the yoke of masculinity. I argue in this article that de l’Horizon elaborates a critical mode called écriture fluide in <i>Blutbuch</i> (2022). By taking this queer and feminist standpoint, de l’Horizon emphasizes that people are always in the process of becoming. This approach captures how de l’Horizon challenges conventional generic categories and linear narration, and how they seek to dissolve the borders between languages, gender identities, as well as human and natural worlds in this book. In particular, I demonstrate that the narrative structure and depictions of childhood growing pains push against a linear model of queer identity that challenges the notion that queer people must leave behind their past and their blood kin in order to become their “true” selves. (JSV)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it