MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404232855 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad9132

Stabilizing effect of the spacetime expansion on the Euler–Poisson equations in Newtonian cosmology

2024· article· en· W4404232855 on OpenAlexaff
Changhua Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsSpacetimeNewtonian fluidCosmologyMathematical physicsClassical mechanicsPoisson distributionEuler equationsEuler's formulaMathematical analysisAstrophysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The validity of the cosmic no-hair theorem for polytropic perfect fluids has been established by (Brauer et al 1994 Class. Quantum Grav. 11 2283) within the context of Newtonian cosmology, specifically under conditions of exponential expansion. This paper extends the investigation to assess the nonlinear stability of homogeneous Newtonian cosmological models under general accelerated expansion for perfect fluids. With appropriate assumptions regarding the expansion rate and decay properties of the homogeneous solution, our results demonstrate that the Euler–Poisson system admits a globally classical solution for initial data that are small perturbations to the homogeneous solution. Additionally, we establish that the solution asymptotically approaches the homogeneous solution as time tends to infinity. The theoretical framework is then applied to various types of perfect fluids, including isothermal gases, Chaplygin gases, and polytropic gases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207