Influencing Factors and Implementation Pathways of Adherence Behavior in Intelligent Personalized Exercise Prescription: Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Personalized intelligent exercise prescriptions have demonstrated significant benefits in increasing physical activity and improving individual health. However, the health benefits of these prescriptions depend on long-term adherence. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the factors influencing adherence to personalized intelligent exercise prescriptions and explore the intrinsic relationship between individual behavioral motivation and adherence. This understanding can help improve adherence and maximize the effectiveness of such prescriptions. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the factors influencing adherence behavior among middle-aged and older community residents who have been prescribed personalized exercise regimens through an electronic health promotion system. It also explores how these factors affect the initiation and maintenance of adherence behavior. METHODS: We used purposive sampling to conduct individual, face-to-face semistructured interviews based on the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) with 12 middle-aged and older community residents who had been following personalized exercise regimens for 8 months. These residents had received detailed exercise health education and guidance from staff. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software through grounded theory. We then applied the TTM and multibehavioral motivation theory to analyze the factors influencing adherence. Additionally, the relationship between behavioral motivations and adherence was explored. RESULTS: Using the behavior change stages of the TTM, open coding yielded 21 initial categories, which were then organized into 8 main categories through axial coding: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, benefit motivation, pleasure motivation, achievement motivation, perceived barriers, self-regulation, and optimization strategies. Selective coding further condensed these 8 main categories into 3 core categories: "multitheory motivation," "obstacle factors," and "solution strategies." Using the coding results, a 3-level model of factors influencing adherence to intelligent personalized exercise prescriptions was developed. Based on this, an implementation path for promoting adherence to intelligent personalized exercise prescriptions was proposed by integrating the model with the TTM. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to personalized exercise prescriptions is influenced by both facilitating factors (eg, multibehavioral motivation, optimization strategies) and obstructive factors (eg, perceived barriers). Achieving and maintaining adherence is a gradual process, shaped by a range of motivations and factors. Personalized solutions, long-term support, feedback mechanisms, and social support networks are essential for promoting adherence. Future efforts should focus on enhancing adherence by strengthening multibehavioral motivation, optimizing solutions, and addressing barriers to improve overall adherence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".