MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404236989 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.1068

RBIO-02. DEVELOPMENT OF FLASH-CAR RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS

2024· article· en· W4404236989 on OpenAlexaff
Hai Ni, Zachary J. Reitman, David G. Kirsch, Yanqing Gong, Yi Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioimmunotherapyFlash (photography)MedicinePhysicsImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pediatric brain tumors including medulloblastoma and high-grade glioma are generally refractory to T cell-based immunotherapy, largely due to an immune-hostile microenvironment infiltrated extensively with immunosuppressive macrophages. Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy holds promise for treating solid tumors, given the potential lower toxicity in normal tissues and possible favorable impact on tumor immunity. Using a genetically engineered mouse model of medulloblastoma and glioma, we show that FLASH radiation stimulates pro-inflammatory polarization in tumor macrophages. Single-cell transcriptome analysis shows that FLASH proton beam radiation skews macrophages towards proinflammatory phenotypes and increases T cell infiltration in the medulloblastoma model. Further bulk transcriptome analyses reveal that FLASH radiation reduces peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ and arginase-1 expression and inhibits immunosuppressive macrophage polarization under stimulus-inducible conditions. Mechanistically, FLASH radiation abrogates lipid oxidase expression and oxidized low-density lipid (oxLDL) generation to reduce PPARγ activity, while standard radiation induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent PPARγ activation in macrophages. Notably, FLASH radiotherapy improves infiltration and activation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and sensitizes tumors to GD2 CAR T immunotherapy in the autochthonous medulloblastoma and syngeneic glioma models. These findings suggest that FLASH radiotherapy may reprogram macrophage lipid metabolism to reverse tumor immunosuppression and that combination FLASH-CAR radioimmunotherapy may offer exciting opportunities for treatment of pediatric brain tumor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→