MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404237093 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0439

CTNI-72. VAL-083 IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED UNDER EXPANDED ACCESS PROGRAM

2024· article· en· W4404237093 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Shaio-Pei Weathers, Rebecca Harrison, Nazanin Majd, Ashley Aaroe, Stephanie Knight, Teresa Hanna, Chirag B. Patel, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Vinay K. Puduvalli

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
KeywordsGlioblastomaMedicineComputer scienceCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Current standard-of-care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery followed by chemoradiation with temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. Almost all GBM patients experience disease progression despite upfront standard-of-care treatment, with a median overall survival of 3-9 months after first recurrence. There are limited treatment options at the time of disease progression, apart from participation in clinical trials. VAL-083 is a bi-functional DNA damaging agent that induces inter-strand DNA cross-links at N7-guanine in a manner independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT). METHODS Under an Expanded Access program (NCT03138629), we used VAL-083 to treat 30 patients with recurrent GBM who were not eligible to participate in clinical trials. Here we report safety and efficacy results. RESULTS Four patients (13.3%) with leptomeningeal disease were excluded from efficacy evaluation. All patients received chemoradiation with TMZ. Twelve (12/26; 46.2%) patients had ≥2 recurrences and 9/26 (34.6%) had prior lomustine. All tumors had ≥1 mutation, with 14/26 (53.8%) having ≥5 mutations; one patient had a hypermutator phenotype. The most common mutations were TERT (57.7%), PTEN (38.5%), TP53 (26.9%), and NF1 (26.9%). All patients started treatment with VAL-083 at 30 mg/m2/day administered on 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Eight (8/26; 30.8%) patients received bevacizumab concurrently with VAL-083. Eight (8/26; 30.8%) patients had a VAL-083 dose reduction. Patients received a median of 3.0 (5-95pth 1-10) VAL-083 treatment cycles. Median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) from last disease progression was 5.1 (95%CI: 2.7-7.2) and 9.8 (95%CI: 5.3-16.4) months, respectively. VAL-083 was well-tolerated and the most frequent adverse events were consistent with prior experience, i.e., thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS Use of VAL-083 continues to show benefit in the treatment of GBM patients who have had multiple recurrences and have limited therapeutic options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→