BIOM-08. LEVERAGING CSF PROTEOMICS TO OPTIMIZE CNS LYMPHOMA MANAGEMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Despite exquisite responses to initial therapy for CNS lymphoma (CNSL), relapse is common and overall responses are disappointing compared to other non-CNS diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Incorporation of multi-agent intraventricular chemotherapy (MAIVC) alongside systemic therapy is novel. Identification of minimally-invasive biomarkers of response to MAIVC are necessary but lacking. The objectives of this study were to 1) identify baseline cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based proteomic predictive biomarkers of MAIVC treatment response and 2) identify tumor burden markers for longitudinal monitoring of MAIVC treatment response in CNSL. METHODS A cohort of patients with primary or secondary CNSL that were treated with MAIVC at Penn State Health (2015-2021) was included. Each MAIVC cycle was administered via Ommaya reservoir and included a 2-drug combination comprised of methotrexate, rituximab, cytarabine, etoposide, topotecan, gemcitabine, or thiotepa. Patient-matched CSF was sampled at pre- and post-therapeutic endpoints and profiled using shotgun proteomics. Patients were grouped by treatment response status. Early responders were defined as patients that achieved malignant cell-free CSF within 6 MAIVC cycles, whereas never responders were those patients that i) did not achieve malignant cell-free CSF by endpoint or ii) required salvage surgery or radiation during MAIVC. RESULTS 59 patients were included (21 primary; 38 secondary CNSL) with a median age of 66 years (range 25-90) and median number of MAIVC cycles of 8 (range 2-23). A proteomic-based classifier, comprised of SGCE, LCP1 and AGRN, discriminated between early and never responders with an AUROC of 0.95. Comparison of CSF at baseline (<3 cycles MAIVC) vs. post-treatment (>12 cycles MAIVC) identified H3F3A, YWHAE, LCP1, CA1 and GAPDH as tumor burden biomarkers. CONCLUSION Here we developed a proteomic signature capable of predicting CNSL patient response to MAIVC, with potential to improve clinical decision making. Furthermore, the biomarkers associated with tumor burden represent important indicators of treatment response. Ongoing efforts are underway to evaluate these candidates as actionable therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".