Personalized Video-Based Hand Taxonomy Using Egocentric Video in the Wild
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hand function is central to inter- actions with our environment. Developing a comprehen- sive model of hand grasps in naturalistic environments is crucial across various disciplines, including robotics, ergonomics, and rehabilitation. Creating such a taxonomy poses challenges due to the significant variation in grasping strategies that individuals may employ. For instance, individuals with impaired hands, such as those with spinal cord injuries (SCI), may develop unique grasps not used by unimpaired individuals. These grasping techniques may differ from person to person, influenced by variable senso- rimotor impairment, creating a need for personalized meth- ods of analysis. METHOD: This study aimed to automatically identify the dominant distinct hand grasps for each indi- vidual without reliance on a priori taxonomies, by applying semantic clustering to egocentric video. Egocentric video recordings collected in the homes of 19 individual with cervical SCI were used to cluster grasping actions with semantic significance. A deep learning model integrating posture and appearance data was employed to create a personalized hand taxonomy. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis reveals a cluster purity of 67.6% ± 24.2% with 18.0% ± 21.8% redundancy. Qualitative assessment revealed meaningful clusters in video content. DISCUSSION: This methodology provides a flexible and effective strategy to analyze hand function in the wild, with applications in clinical assess- ment and in-depth characterization of human-environment interactions in a variety of contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".