MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404242256 · doi:10.3354/meps14748

Great shearwater Ardenna gravis attendance at commercial fisheries in the Argentine economic fishing zone

2024· article· en· W4404242256 on OpenAlexaff
José Carlos Laguna de Paz, Juan Pablo Seco Pon, S Copello, Rocío Mariano-Jelicich, RA Ronconi, Peter G. Ryan, Ben J. Dilley, D Davies, Marco Favero

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryFishingExclusive economic zoneAttendanceOceanographyShearwaterGeographyBiologySeabirdEcologyEconomicsGeologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The great shearwater Ardenna gravis is a pelagic seabird that forages in waters of the southwestern Atlantic Ocean mainly during the pre-laying and chick-rearing periods. There, the species has been reported in the bycatch of longline and trawl fisheries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fishing effort on the foraging behavior of shearwaters, analyzing the distribution and behavior of birds and fishing effort and using evidence from isotope analysis to assess their use of fishery discards and facilitated prey. Tracking data of immature and adult shearwaters and fishing effort of different Argentine commercial fishing fleets were used to determine the effect of fishing effort on the foraging behavior of the species through generalized additive mixed models. Adult and immature shearwaters are more likely to forage when the fishing effort of demersal high-seas ice-trawlers increases and that of coastal demersal ice-trawlers decreases (and mid-water ice-trawlers for immatures). The isotope analysis showed higher contribution of zooplanktonic species and mid-water fish, followed by demersal species (which can be only available through the consumption of discards and offal). These results are related to the common use of highly productive waters and the attraction of shearwaters generated by prey captured in nets and by discards as a predictable source of food. Understanding the impact of fisheries on seabird behavior is essential for implementing measures aimed at reducing the incidental capture of seabirds by fishing fleets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207