MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404246756 · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00305-5

Funding and its impact on the administration and organisational efficiency of technical vocational education and training institutions

2024· article· en· W4404246756 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Education · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSocio-economic Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationTraining (meteorology)Administration (probate law)BusinessMedical educationPolitical scienceEngineering managementEngineeringMedicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, the author examines how the lack of funding can impact the administration and the organisational efficiency of technical vocational education and training (TVET) institutions (I). The research examines human capital development and TVET as instruments for propelling growth and development and contributing to Trinidad and Tobago’s (T&T) economic and social advancements. The study explored how TVETIs can be a central pillar in the progress of T&T’s development. The research material consists of 10 interviews with educational experts from four postsecondary TVETIs in T&T and the chief executive of T&T TVET’s regulatory body. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with the leading regulator, instructors, managers, and a curriculum expert. The author utilised thematic analysis in the research by adopting a deductive approach. The data revealed several challenges that engulf the administration and management of TVETI in T&T, mainly because of financial woes. Three themes emerged from the data: Funding for Administration, Funding for Human Capital Development and Funding for Organisational Efficiency. Insightful revelations were unearthed from the educational experts, which were generated from the data which provide an in-depth perspective on the administration and management of TVET in T&T. The results show that T&T’s education experts see funding as a significant challenge. Many argue that a lack of funding severely impacts their institutions, which erodes human capital development growth. The study concludes that a lack of funding can severely and has impacted TVET in several ways. An absence or a lack of funding brought the closure of top-notch schools used in the training and growth of teachers for the educational system. Human capital development and TVET were also highlighted as essential tools for economic and social deprivation. However, a better approach is needed to finance TVET moving forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it