MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404247543 · doi:10.1186/s12991-024-00527-9

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) as treatment for nicotine cessation in psychiatric populations: a systematic review

2024· review· en· W4404247543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of General Psychiatry · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkBrain and Cognition Discovery FoundationQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNicotineMedicineSmoking cessationPsychiatryCravingNicotine withdrawalAddictionPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nicotine use and nicotine use disorder (NUD) are the leading causes of preventable death in the United States. Persons with mental disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder) are differentially susceptible to nicotine use. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are indicated for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity and show preliminary evidence of efficacy in addiction-related behaviours. Herein, we synthesize extant preclinical and clinical evidence evaluating the effect of GLP-1RAs on neurobiological systems and behaviours salient to nicotine consumption and cessation. METHODS: Online databases (MedLine, Embase, AMED, PsychINFO, JBI EBP Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar) were searched from inception to May 21, 2024. Relevant studies were also extracted from the reference lists of the obtained articles. All articles were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Administration of GLP-1RAs reduced nicotine self-administration and nicotine-seeking behaviour in animal models that, in some cases, is sustained beyond exposure to the agent. GLP-1RAs also mitigated post-nicotine cessation weight gain, craving, withdrawal, and hyperphagia. The preceding effects are attributable to modulation of reward-related brain regions (e.g., mesolimbic dopamine system), resulting in nicotine aversion. GLP-1RAs were also efficacious as adjunctive therapies [e.g., in combination with nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs)]. CONCLUSION: The multi-effect characteristics in NUD paradigms provide a compelling rationale for large, adequately powered, long-term, randomized controlled trials of GLP-1RAs in the treatment and prevention of NUD. The replicated effect on mitigating post-nicotine cessation weight gain is a differentiating feature of GLP-1RAs from extant proven therapies for NUD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it