MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404248449 · doi:10.14428/rqj2022.10.01.05

La croissance démographique entre science et science-fiction :

2024· article· fr· W4404248449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bénédicte Gastineau, Valérie Golaz, Stéphanie Dos Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Quetelet + Quetelet journal/Revue Quetelet + Quetelet Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Technological Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationPopulation growthQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceGeographySociologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméDepuis 1950, les Nations Unies publient des projections de population. Ces projections suscitent depuis cette date de nombreuses inquiétudes aussi bien dans les organisations internationales, que dans l’opinion publique. La croissance de la population annoncée par les projections parait pour beaucoup annonciatrice de famines, dégradations des ressources, conflits. Les auteurs de science-fiction notamment anglo-saxonne se nourrissent de ces peurs pour leurs romans. La croissance démographique se retrouve au centre de l’intrigue de Make room! Make room!, Les Monades urbaines, Tous à Zanzibar… La science-fiction imagine ce que la science démographique ne prévoit pas : des modes de vie et de production, des organisations sociales contraintes par un « surpeuplement ». Si la science-fiction ne se révèle pas forcément comme un moyen de prédire l’avenir, elle est, entre 1950 et 1980, un bon révélateur des peurs et des angoisses liées à la croissance démographique. Mots-clés : Démographie, science-fiction, projection, croissance démographique AbstractThe United Nations has been publishing population projections since 1958. Since then, these projections have given rise to a great deal of concern among both international organisations and public opinion. The population growth predicted by the projections seems to many to herald famine, resource degradation and conflict. Science fiction writers, particularly in the English-speaking world, feed these fears into their novels. Population growth is central to the plot of Make Room! Make room!, Les Monades urbaines, Tous à Zanzibar... Science fiction imagines what demographic science does not: ways of living and producing, social organisations constrained by ‘overpopulation’. While science fiction was not necessarily a means of predicting the future, between 1950 and 1980 it did reveal the fears and anxieties associated with demographic growth. Keywords: Demography, Science fiction, projection, population growth

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Quetelet + Quetelet journal/Revue Quetelet + Quetelet JournalSame topicEconomic and Technological InnovationFrench-language works237,207