MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404256899 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0500

DDDR-15. UTILIZING DEEP DOCKING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE DISCOVERY OF NOVEL PARP1-SELECTIVE INHIBITORS FOR USE AGAINST BRAIN TUMORS

2024· article· en· W4404256899 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Truong, Fuqiang Ban, Jason R. Smith, Beibei Zhai, Louise Ramos, Mona Marzban, Fariba Ghaidi, Hans Adomat, Xiaoqi Chen, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Jeffrey Bacha, Colin C. Collins, Artem Cherkasov, Mads Daugaard

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocking (animal)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePARP1Drug discoveryComputational biologyNeuroscienceBioinformaticsBiologyMedicinePoly ADP ribose polymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain tumors, including primary brain tumors and central nervous system (CNS) metastases, remain among the most challenging malignancies to treat, with therapeutic options often limited by the inability of drugs to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a key enzyme in DNA repair, and inhibition of PARP1 specifically drives synthetic lethality in BRCA-mutated disease. While they’ve achieved commercial success, first generation PARP inhibitors are limited in their utility as they cannot readily pass through the blood-brain barrier and have adverse side effects, likely driven by the collateral inhibition of PARP2. Development of a PARP1-selective, CNS penetrant inhibitor could reduce toxicity, while providing a new therapeutic option for brain tumors. Traditional drug discovery methods are time-consuming and costly, necessitating innovative approaches. Here, we describe the application of Deep Docking, an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) approach, to discover a novel, PARP1-selective inhibitor for use against brain tumors. Deep Docking utilizes deep learning to accelerate the prediction of the binding affinity of a large number of compounds to target proteins, streamlining the virtual screening process and allowing for rapid docking of billions of compounds against the PARP1 protein. Additionally, state-of-the-art generative algorithms and deep learning techniques for predicting drug-like properties such as metabolism, permeability, and safety profiles, can be combined to rapidly perform hit-to-lead optimization. We will present preliminary Deep Docking screening results from billions of compounds, identifying several with predicted high binding affinities for PARP-1. Validating in vitro and in vivo data, including PARP1 selectivity, metabolic stability, pharmacokinetic profile, CNS penetration and safety profile, will be described. Application of the Deep Docking AI platform is being used to significantly accelerate the discovery of a selective PARP-1 inhibitor for brain tumors. This approach will not only improve the efficiency of drug discovery but also enhance the specificity and efficacy of potential therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicComputational Drug Discovery Methods→French-language works237,207→