L’importance des croyances pour favoriser les pratiques inclusives au sein d'une communauté d'apprentissage professionnelle en éducation physique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude qualitative interprétative phénoménologique documente les croyances de 16 personnes enseignantes d’éducation physique et à la santé (EPS) qui ont participé à une communauté d'apprentissage professionnelle (CAP) visant des pratiques inclusives. Ancrés dans la théorie du comportement planifié, les résultats dévoilent les croyances préalables positives et une meilleure sensibilité aux besoins des élèves après la CAP. Certaines attitudes négatives ont persisté envers les difficultés comportementales. Des obstacles liés à la charge de travail supplémentaire et au temps ont été relevés. Néanmoins, la CAP a renforcé la contrôlabilité des personnes enseignantes. Cette étude éclaire l’apport distinctif des dimensions des croyances sur les pratiques inclusives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".