Simulation and Analysis of the Loading, Relaxation, and Recovery Behavior of Polyethylene and Its Pipes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spring-dashpot models have long been used to simulate the mechanical behavior of polymers, but their usefulness is limited because multiple model parameter values can reproduce the experimental data. In view of this limitation, this study explores the possibility of improving uniqueness of parameter values so that the parameters can be used to establish the relationship between deformation and microstructural changes. An approach was developed based on stress during the loading, relaxation, and recovery of polyethylene. In total, 1000 sets of parameter values were determined for fitting the data from the relaxation stages with a discrepancy within 0.08 MPa. Despite a small discrepancy, the 1000 sets showed a wide range of variation, but one model parameter, σv,L0, followed two distinct paths rather than random distribution. The five selected sets of parameter values with discrepancies below 0.04 MPa were found to be highly consistent, except for the characteristic relaxation time. Therefore, this study concludes that the uniqueness of model parameter values can be improved to characterize the mechanical behavior of polyethylene. This approach then determined the quasi-static stress of four polyethylene pipes, which showed that these pipes had very close quasi-static stress. This indicates that the uniqueness of the parameter values can be improved for the spring-dashpot model, enabling further study using spring-dashpot models to characterize polyethylene's microstructural changes during deformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".