Noncanonical altPIDD1 protein: unveiling the true major translational output of the <i>PIDD1</i> gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteogenomics has enabled the detection of novel proteins encoded in noncanonical or alternative open reading frames (altORFs) in genes already coding a reference protein. Reanalysis of proteomic and ribo-seq data revealed that the p53-induced death domain-containing protein (or PIDD1 ) gene encodes a second 171 amino acid protein, altPIDD1, in addition to the known 910-amino acid-long PIDD1 protein. The two ORFs overlap almost completely, and the translation initiation site of altPIDD1 is located upstream of PIDD1. AltPIDD1 has more translational and protein level evidence than PIDD1 across various cell lines and tissues. In HEK293 cells, the altPIDD1 to PIDD1 ratio is 40 to 1, as measured with isotope-labeled (heavy) peptides and targeted proteomics. AltPIDD1 localizes to cytoskeletal structures labeled with phalloidin and interacts with cytoskeletal proteins. Unlike most noncanonical proteins, altPIDD1 is not evolutionarily young but emerged in placental mammals. Overall, we identify PIDD1 as a dual-coding gene, with altPIDD1, not the annotated protein, being the primary product of translation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".