MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404270432 · doi:10.2196/53447

Using a Device-Free Wi-Fi Sensing System to Assess Daily Activities and Mobility in Low-Income Older Adults: Protocol for a Feasibility Study

2024· article· en· W4404270432 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jane Chung, Ingrid Pretzer‐Aboff, Pamela Parsons, Katherine Falls, Eyuphan Bulut

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusActivities of daily livingDementiaCognitionEthnic groupGerontologyComputer scienceApplied psychologyMedicinePsychologyPopulationPhysical therapyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Older adults belonging to racial or ethnic minorities with low socioeconomic status are at an elevated risk of developing dementia, but resources for assessing functional decline and detecting cognitive impairment are limited. Cognitive impairment affects the ability to perform daily activities and mobility behaviors. Traditional assessment methods have drawbacks, so smart home technologies (SmHT) have emerged to offer objective, high-frequency, and remote monitoring. However, these technologies usually rely on motion sensors that cannot identify specific activity types. This group often lacks access to these technologies due to limited resources and technology experience. There is a need to develop new sensing technology that is discreet, affordable, and requires minimal user engagement to characterize and quantify various in-home activities. Furthermore, it is essential to explore the feasibility of developing machine learning (ML) algorithms for SmHT through collaborations between clinical researchers and engineers and involving minority, low-income older adults for novel sensor development. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the feasibility of developing a novel channel state information-based device-free, low-cost Wi-Fi sensing system, and associated ML algorithms for localizing and recognizing different patterns of in-home activities and mobility in residents of low-income senior housing with and without mild cognitive impairment. METHODS: This feasibility study was conducted in collaboration with a wellness care group, which serves the healthy aging needs of low-income housing residents. Prior to this feasibility study, we conducted a pilot study to collect channel state information data from several activity scenarios (eg, sitting, walking, and preparing meals) using the proposed Wi-Fi sensing system continuously over a week in apartments of low-income housing residents. These activities were videotaped to generate ground truth annotations to test the accuracy of the ML algorithms derived from the proposed system. Using qualitative individual interviews, we explored the acceptability of the Wi-Fi sensing system and implementation barriers in the low-income housing setting. We use the same study protocol for the proposed feasibility study. RESULTS: The Wi-Fi sensing system deployment began in November 2022, with participant recruitment starting in July 2023. Preliminary results will be available in the summer of 2025. Preliminary results are focused on the feasibility of developing ML models for Wi-Fi sensing-based activity and mobility assessment, community-based recruitment and data collection, ground truth, and older adults' Wi-Fi sensing technology acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study can make a contribution to SmHT science and ML capabilities for early detection of cognitive decline among socially vulnerable older adults. Currently, sensing devices are not readily available to this population due to cost and information barriers. Our sensing device has the potential to identify individuals at risk for cognitive decline by assessing their level of physical function by tracking their in-home activities and mobility behaviors, at a low cost. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53447.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.414
GPT teacher head0.562
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207