MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404276897 · doi:10.1080/15481603.2024.2427326

Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain

2024· article· en· W4404276897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGIScience & Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTerrainLidarSnow coverRemote sensingSnowGeographyIntensity (physics)Physical geographyEnvironmental scienceCover (algebra)CartographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differentially mapping snow depth in mountain watersheds from airborne laser altimetry is a valuable hydrologic technique that has seen an expanded use in recent years. Additionally, lidar systems also record the strength of the returned light pulse (i.e. intensity), which can be used to characterize snow surface properties. For near-infrared lidar systems, return intensity is relatively high over snow and inversely related to the effective grain size, a primary control on snow albedo. Raw intensity is also sensitive to laser range and incidence angle, however, and requires a correction for snow property retrieval that is especially pertinent in mountainous terrain. Here, we describe a workflow to correct the intensity using the plane trajectory, lidar scan angle, and lidar-derived topography. As a proof of concept for snow retrievals, we apply the workflow to an airborne 1064 nm lidar flight over a snow-covered mountain basin in the Colorado Rockies. Corrected intensity was empirically related to reflectance before delineating snow extent and retrieving grain size. Relative to the traditional snow classification derived from optical imagery, the lidar-derived snow extent covered 5.4% more area due to the fine resolution point cloud and absence of shadows common in optical imagery. The lidar-derived grain size retrievals had a MAE of 32 µm compared to those from field spectroscopy, which translated to a 1% error in snow albedo. We found high incidence angles yielded an overcorrection in intensity that introduced a high bias in the grain size distribution and, therefore, suggest using an incidence angle threshold (40°). Developing methods specifically for quantitative snow surface property retrievals from lidar intensity is timely and relevant as aerial lidar is increasingly being used to map snow depth for hydrologic and cryospheric studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it