MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404279288 · doi:10.31261/pn.4243

W Katowicach się urodziła miłość do Syjonu. Konferencja Katowicka protosyjonistów w 1884 roku – źródła, wydarzenia, postacie, rocznice

2024· book· en· W4404279288 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Barbara Kalinowska-Wójcik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of CambridgeYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaAmerican Academy for Jewish Research
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In November 1884, Katowice became an important location on the map of the emerging proto-Zionist movement. Delegates from the Lovers of Zion Movement, known as Chovevei Zion, gathered in the city to decide on supporting the settlement initiative in the Land of Israel and seeking international support for it. This work presents the circumstances leading to the decision to hold the conference in Katowice. It explains the direct and indirect reasons for choosing this location and why the representatives of the local Jewish community were so actively involved in organizing the meeting. The publication includes appendices that critically edit the translations of the conference protocols from 1883 and 1884, as well as jubilee publications from 1909 and 1934.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207