Identification of methylation-sensitive human transcription factors using meSMiLE-seq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) are key players in eukaryotic gene regulation, but the DNA binding specificity of many TFs remains unknown. Here, we assayed 284 mostly poorly characterized, putative human TFs using selective microfluidics-based ligand enrichment followed by sequencing (SMiLE-seq), revealing 72 new DNA binding motifs. To investigate whether some of the 158 TFs for which we did not find motifs preferably bind epigenetically modified DNA (i.e. methylated CG dinucleotides), we developed methylation-sensitive SMiLE-seq (meSMiLE-seq). This microfluidic assay simultaneously probes the affinity of a protein to methylated and unmethylated DNA, augmenting the capabilities of the original method to infer methylation-aware binding sites. We assayed 114 TFs with meSMiLE-seq and identified DNA-binding models for 48 proteins, including the known methylation-sensitive binding modes for POU5F1 and RFX5. For 11 TFs, binding to methylated DNA was preferred or resulted in the discovery of alternative, methylation-dependent motifs (e.g. PRDM13), while aversion towards methylated sequences was found for 13 TFs (e.g. USF3). Finally, we uncovered a potential role for ZHX2 as a putative binder of Z-DNA, a left-handed helical DNA structure which is adopted more frequently upon CpG methylation. Altogether, our study significantly expands the human TF codebook by identifying DNA binding motifs for 98 TFs, while providing a versatile platform to quantitatively assay the impact of DNA modifications on TF binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".