Effect of vagal nerve stimulation on patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on the seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (bi-TLE). Additionally, we aimed to determine the safety of VNS and its side effects. METHODS: Our retrospective study included 17 patients with bi-TLE who underwent VNS-device implantation at our center from 1997 to 2019. The main outcome was a reduction in seizure frequency. Bitemporal cases were confirmed using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or invasive electroencephalography (iEEG). RESULTS: The median age at seizure onset was 18 years. Bi-TLE was confirmed by scalp EEG in 47 % and by iEEG in 53 % of the patients. The median follow-up period was 36 months. The median seizure frequency per month before and after VNS was 9.5 (IQR = 4.3-35.3) and 2 (IQR = 0.8-4.2), respectively. Compared to baseline, 70.5 % of the patients achieved ≥ 50 % reduction in seizure frequency, whereas 35.3 % experienced either no or minimal reduction in seizure frequency. The response rate (>50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was 87.5 % in patients who underwent scalp EEG and 55.5 % in those who underwent iEEG. For VNS treatment, the median follow-up was at 36 months (IQR = 17-46.5). Adverse effects were observed in 59 % of the patients, including cough and hoarseness. DISCUSSION: Therapeutic choices are limited in cases of drug-resistant bi-TLE. Our study on VNS-device implantation in bi-TLE suggests a positive outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".