Behavioural Change Piecewise Constant Spatial Epidemic Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human behaviour significantly affects the dynamics of infectious disease transmission as people adjust their behavior in response to outbreak intensity, thereby impacting disease spread and control efforts. In recent years, there have been efforts to incorporate behavioural change into spatio-temporal individual-level models within a Bayesian MCMC framework. In this past work, parametric spatial risk functions were employed, depending on strong underlying assumptions regarding disease transmission mechanisms within the population. However, selecting appropriate parametric functions can be challenging in real-world scenarios, and incorrect assumptions may lead to erroneous conclusions. As an alternative, non-parametric approaches offer greater flexibility. The goal of this study is to investigate the utilization of semi-parametric spatial models for infectious disease transmission, integrating an "alarm function" to account for behavioural change based on infection prevalence over time within a Bayesian MCMC framework. In this paper, we discuss findings from both simulated and real-life epidemics, focusing on constant piecewise distance functions with fixed change points. We also demonstrate the selection of the change points using the Deviance Information Criteria (DIC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it