Modelling the Repair of Carbon-Centered Protein Radicals by Phenolic Antioxidants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidative stress is a biological process that has been linked to many diseases, hence understanding how to prevent and repair it is essential to medicine. The thermodynamics and kinetics of the repair reactions of radically damaged leucine (a lateral chain in a simplified protein environment) by twenty phenolic antioxidants are studied at the M06-2X(SMD)/6-31++G(d,p) level of theory in water and pentyl ethanoate. The two repair mechanisms modelled are formal-hydrogen atom transfer (f-HAT) and single electron transfer (SET). Although all f-HAT reactions are thermodynamically favourable, only one of the phenols produced rate constants in the diffusion limit, exhibiting biological relevance. SET is not suspected to be an important repair pathway for the phenols studied. We show that the Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle, which relates thermodynamics and kinetics properties for a reaction, breaks down when comparing between the solvents, protein repair sites, and the phenolic antioxidants. While thermodynamic data can be used as valuable screening tools, the kinetic calculation of rate constants in solution is crucial for enhancing the biological relevance of theoretical studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".