MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404284217 · doi:10.5035/nishiseisai.73.799

当院における大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の治療成績

2024· article· ja· W4404284217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
周 照屋, 哲 仲宗根, 正道 翁長, 郁之 鷲﨑, 尚弘 伊藝, さくら 國吉, 康太郎 西田

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopedics & Traumatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

【はじめに】今回,Vancouver分類に基づいて当院における大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の治療成績を検討した.【対象】2018年1月~2023年6月に当院で大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の治療を行った9例で,受傷時のVancouver分類はtype B1:3例,type B2:6例,全例セメントレスステムTHAであった.治療はtype B1の3例に骨接合術を行い,type B2の2例に骨接合術,4例にステム再置換術を行った.検討項目として臨床評価は手術内容,免荷期間,先行手術から骨折までの期間,歩行能力,合併症とし,画像評価はステム沈下量,骨癒合の有無とした.【結果】全例で骨癒合が得られたが,type B1の1例に歩行能力の低下を認めた.合併症はtype B2で浅層感染1例,大転子骨折1例を認めた.type B2の骨接合を行った2例にステム沈下を認めた.【まとめ】当院での大腿骨ステム周囲骨折の治療成績は概ね良好であった.Vancouver分類type B2での骨接合術の適応は先行手術から骨折までの時期により考慮し得ると思われた.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopedics & TraumatologySame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207