MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404288288 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1502482

Corrigendum: The predictive validity of a Brain Care Score for late-life depression and a composite outcome of dementia, stroke, and late-life depression: data from the UK Biobank cohort

2024· erratum· en· W4404288288 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjula Singh, Cyprien Rivier, Keren Papier, Zeina Chemali, Leidys Gutiérrez-Martínez, Livia Parodi, Ernst Mayerhofer, Jasper R. Senff, Santiago Clocchiatti‐Tuozzo, Courtney Nunley, Amy Newhouse, An Ouyang, M. Brandon Westover, Rudolph E. Tanzi, Ronald M. Lazar, Aleksandra Pikula, Sarah Ibrahim, H. Bart Brouwers, Virginia J. Howard, George Howard, Nirupama Yechoor, Thomas J. Littlejohns, Kevin N. Sheth, Jonathan Rosand, Gregory L. Fricchione, Christopher D. Anderson, Guido J. Falcone

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)BiobankDementiaCohortMedicinePredictive validityStroke (engine)PsychiatryLate life depressionCohort studyPsychologyGerontologyClinical psychologyInternal medicineBioinformaticsCognitionDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the published article Dr. Westover’s disclosure statement was inadvertently omitted. The disclosure should read:"Dr. M. Brandon Westover has private equity as co-founder of Beacon Biosignals and receives compensation for consulting and scientific advisory roles. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”The authors apologize for this omission and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207