MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404292590 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i1.3178

A Smart Fertilizer Calculation Computer Simulator For The Land Preparation Of Paddy Crop Field Based On WSN Leads To Precision Agriculture

2020· article· en· W4404292590 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Utpal Kumar Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultural engineeringField (mathematics)FertilizerAgriculturePaddy fieldComputer sciencePrecision agricultureCropEnvironmental scienceField cropSimulationAgronomyEngineeringMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This proposed work is implemented on Java platform to simulate the land preparation for paddy crops interactively and listed out the name and quantity of fertilizers required to the proposed crop-field prior to start the agricultural process. Life in the land can only possible when adequate food is available to us. And today’s technology goes a level to make the available land suitable for the crops and agriculture. Our work is focused on to develop a simulator tool which offers high customizable platform in terms of number of sensors, area of the field, position of Base Station (BS), type of fertilizers and chemicals, etc. Many agricultural based simulators are developed which deal with monitoring, harvesting, irrigation etc. But this proposed simulator is designed to helps farmers to draw an idea before starting farming in a practical crop field and provides the list of fertilizers needed for the crop field for suitable agriculture and to achieve high yield production which helps to fulfil the high population food consumption. Key features of this proposed simulator are delight visualization, real-time monitoring, instant controlling, and best suggestion of fertilizers with quantity. The proposed system has been developed on JDK 8 with Netbeans IDE. Java Swing is capable of talking with the real sensors over the network, hence this simulator can be upgraded to the real-time software application with interfacing real soil sensors. CCS CONCEPTS • Paddy Crop • Land Preparation • Computer Simulator

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicWireless Sensor Networks and IoTFrench-language works237,207