The End of a Cultural Desert? The Council for the Encouragement of Music and the Arts (CEMA) and the Northern Irish Artistic Scene (1943-1963)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article focuses on the development of a dynamic local artistic scene in Northern Ireland in the 1950s. The creation of the Council for the Encouragement of Music and the Arts of Northern Ireland (CEMA NI) led to increasing financial support to local artists and to an open-hand policy to parts of the population not yet acquainted with the arts. The Council tried to change the perception of the arts as a highbrow activity by taking them out of arts-dedicated buildings and promoting tours of small-scale events. It laid the foundation for a decentralised system based on local art committees and local authorities. This led to a growth in regionalist arts in Northern Ireland. However, the strong influence of the unionist government over the CEMA limited the scope of the Council’s action to artists and companies who did not object to Northern Ireland’s political status. If Northern Ireland saw a rebirth of its artistic scene in the 1940s-1950s, authorities were reluctant to grant the CEMA more autonomy or more financial means.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".