MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404296034 · doi:10.29173/cjen294

This was not an accident: An injury prevention primer for emergency and community nurses

2003· article· en· W4404296034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shelley Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Nursing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimer (cosmetics)Medical emergencyAccident and emergencyEmergency nursingAccident (philosophy)MedicinePsychologyNursingEmergency department

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early one morning in February, Alison, 18 months old, is in the kitchen with her father and two older sisters. While her father is getting the two older children ready for school, Alison reaches up and pulls on the tablecloth. Her father had set his coffee down near the edge of the table; the cup is pulled off. The hot liquid lands on the toddler and scalds parts of her face, shoulder and arm. Alison is taken to the emergency room, where she is treated for second-degree burns. Julian, aged three, is playing in his bedroom while his parents carry grocery bags from the car to the kitchen. After a few minutes, Julian doesn’t answer their calls. He is no longer in his room. He has slipped through the patio door into the pool, to which he gained access via the elevated deck attached to the house. It is only the beginning of May and the water is freezing. Julian is resuscitated and rushed to the emergency department. He is admitted to the intensive care unit where his condition is listed as critical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.015
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0150.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency NursingSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207