Motor learning promotes regionally-specific spindle-slow wave coupled cerebral memory reactivation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sleep is essential for the optimal consolidation of newly acquired memories. This study examines the neurophysiological processes underlying memory consolidation during sleep, via reactivation. Here, we investigated the impact of slow wave - spindle (SW-SP) coupling on regionally-task-specific brain reactivations following motor sequence learning. Utilizing simultaneous EEG-fMRI during sleep, our findings revealed that memory reactivation occured time-locked to coupled SW-SP complexes, and specifically in areas critical for motor sequence learning. Notably, these reactivations were confined to the hemisphere actively involved in learning the task. This regional specificity highlights a precise and targeted neural mechanism, underscoring the crucial role of SW-SP coupling. In addition, we observed double-dissociation whereby primary sensory areas were recruited time-locked to uncoupled spindles; suggesting a role for uncoupled spindles in sleep maintenance. These findings advance our understanding the functional significance of SW-SP coupling for enhancing memory in a regionally-specific manner, that is functionally dissociable from uncoupled spindles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".