Potential Flood Hazard Mapping Based on GIS and Analytical Hierarchy Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flooding is one of the most common natural dangers occurring almost everywhere. Remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) are common and effective tools for hydrological analysis assessment and hazard management. Using GIS and remote sensing techniques, this study aimed to identify flood hazard maps in the Diyala governorate with a higher vulnerability to floods. Nine influencing parameters were collected, including elevation, slope, distance from the road, distance from the river, rainfall, drainage density, land use and land cover, normalized vegetation index, and topographic wetness index. The collected data were processed using GIS software and then relative weights were estimated using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach to produce a flood map. According to the findings of this study, the largest zone, about 64% of the study area, faces moderate potential flood hazard, a very small area of less than 1% faces very high and very low potential flood dangers, and approximately 35% of the study area is subjected to high and low flood hazard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".