Deciphering the tissue-specific functional effect of Alzheimer risk SNPs with deep genome annotation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a highly heritable brain dementia, along with substantial failure of cognitive function. Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have led to a set of SNPs significantly associated with AD and related traits. GWAS hits usually emerge as clusters where a lead SNP with the highest significance is surrounded by other less significant neighboring SNPs. Although functionality is not guaranteed even with the strongest associations in GWASs, lead SNPs have historically been the focus of the field, with the remaining associations inferred to be redundant. Recent deep genome annotation tools enable the prediction of function from a segment of a DNA sequence with significantly improved precision, which allows in-silico mutagenesis to interrogate the functional effect of SNP alleles. In this project, we explored the impact of top AD GWAS hits around APOE region on chromatin functions and whether it will be altered by the genetic context (i.e., alleles of neighboring SNPs). Our results showed that highly correlated SNPs in the same LD block could have distinct impacts on downstream functions. Although some GWAS lead SNPs showed dominant functional effects regardless of the neighborhood SNP alleles, several other SNPs did exhibit enhanced loss or gain of function under certain genetic contexts, suggesting potential additional information hidden in the LD blocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".