MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4135252: Associations between Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension and 30-Day Readmissions Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations.

2024· article· en· W4404302672 on OpenAlexaff
N. Ben Abdallah, Abdilahi Mohamoud, Meriam Abdallah

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionPulmonary hypertensionInternal medicineCardiologyEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a major contributor to cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this, little is known regarding the outcomes of 30-day re-admissions following Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in the context of group 2 PH. Hypothesis: Group 2 PH is associated with a higher likelihood of 30-day readmissions in patients presenting with AMI. Goal: To assess the relationship between group 2 PH and adverse hospitalization outcomes in cases of AMI. Methods: We queried the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) and identified AMI as the primary diagnosis. We compared in-hospital outcomes based on the presence versus absence of Group 2 PH. The primary outcome was 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes included the odds of in-patient mortality, mechanical ventilation use, vasopressor use, and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for confounders. Results: Among 182,308 AMI hospitalizations, 364 (0.2%) had a secondary diagnosis of Group 2 PH. Group 2 PH was associated with a higher likelihood of re-admission within 30 days (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.21, 95% CI 1.07–1.36, p=0.002). Additionally among patients presenting with AMI, group 2 PH was associated with higher odds of in-patient mortality (aOR 2.64, 95% CI 1.52–4.58, p=0.001), mechanical ventilation use (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.19–3.6, p=0.010), vasopressor use (aOR 5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10.9, p<0.001) and MCS use (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.46-3.91, p<0.001) during index hospitalization compared to the patients without group 2 PH. Conclusion: Patients with Group 2 PH admitted for AMI had higher odds of 30-day readmissions and both fatal and non-fatal adverse outcomes compared to patients without PH. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and develop strategies to improve outcomes for this high-risk population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→