MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404305437 · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08130-4

High-temperature 205Tl decay clarifies 205Pb dating in early Solar System

2024· article· en· W4404305437 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Leckenby, R. S. Sidhu, Rui Jiu Chen, R. Mancino, Balázs Szányi, M. Bai, Umberto Battino, K. Blaum, C. Brandau, S. Cristallo, T. Dickel, I. Dillmann, D. Dmytriiev, T. Faestermann, O. Forstner, B. Franczak, H. Geißel, R. Gernhäuser, J. Glorius, Christopher Griffin, A. Gumberidze, E. Haettner, P.‐M. Hillenbrand, Amanda I. Karakas, Tejpreet Kaur, W. Korten, C. Kozhuharov, N. Kuzminchuk, K. Langanke, S. Litvinov, Yu. A. Litvinov, Maria Lugaro, G. Martı́nez-Pinedo, E. Menz, B. S. Meyer, T. Morgenroth, Thomas Neff, Chiara Nociforo, N. Petridis, M. Pignatari, Ulrich Popp, S. Purushothaman, R. Reifarth, M. S. Sanjari, C. Scheidenberger, U. Spillmann, M. Steck, Th. Stöhlker, Y. Tanaka, M. Trassinelli, Sergiy Trotsenko, László Varga, D. Vescovi, M. Wang, H. Weick, Andrés Yagüe López, Takayuki Yamaguchi, Y. H. Zhang, J. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
FundersOffice of International Science and EngineeringGSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalEmberi Eroforrások MinisztériumaMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionUniversity of HullExtreMe Matter Institute, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSumitomo FoundationNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós AlapGrantová Agentura České RepublikyLos Alamos National LaboratoryNational Nuclear Security AdministrationJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNucleosynthesisPhysicsRadioactive decayMeteoriteSolar SystemAstrophysicsFormation and evolution of the Solar SystemIonizationStarsNeutron captureNeutronNuclear physicsIonAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Radioactive nuclei with lifetimes on the order of millions of years can reveal the formation history of the Sun and active nucleosynthesis occurring at the time and place of its birth 1,2 . Among such nuclei whose decay signatures are found in the oldest meteorites, 205 Pb is a powerful example, as it is produced exclusively by slow neutron captures (the s process), with most being synthesized in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars 3–5 . However, making accurate abundance predictions for 205 Pb has so far been impossible because the weak decay rates of 205 Pb and 205 Tl are very uncertain at stellar temperatures 6,7 . To constrain these decay rates, we measured for the first time the bound-state β − decay of fully ionized 205 Tl 81+ , an exotic decay mode that only occurs in highly charged ions. The measured half-life is 4.7 times longer than the previous theoretical estimate 8 and our 10% experimental uncertainty has eliminated the main nuclear-physics limitation. With new, experimentally backed decay rates, we used AGB stellar models to calculate 205 Pb yields. Propagating those yields with basic galactic chemical evolution (GCE) and comparing with the 205 Pb/ 204 Pb ratio from meteorites 9–11 , we determined the isolation time of solar material inside its parent molecular cloud. We find positive isolation times that are consistent with the other s -process short-lived radioactive nuclei found in the early Solar System. Our results reaffirm the site of the Sun’s birth as a long-lived, giant molecular cloud and support the use of the 205 Pb– 205 Tl decay system as a chronometer in the early Solar System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207