MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404307300 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3496907

Speckle Noise Reduction for Medical Ultrasound Images Using Hybrid CNN-Transformer Network

2024· article· en· W4404307300 on OpenAlex
Anparasy Sivaanpu, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Rui Zheng, Michelle Noga, Dean Ta, Edmond Lou, Lawrence H. Le

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpeckle noiseComputer scienceNoise reductionSpeckle patternArtificial intelligenceUltrasoundMedical ultrasoundReduction (mathematics)Computer visionTransformerAcousticsElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound images are often affected by limited resolution, artifacts, and inherent speckle noise. To address these challenges, researchers have explored denoising approaches. Recently, deep learning methods have demonstrated distinct advantages in ultrasound image denoising. However, further improvements are needed to preserve structural details, such as boundaries, edges, and margins. This paper proposes a hybrid CNN-transformer network called HCTSpeckle, an encoder-decoder network with a fusion block designed to enhance ultrasound images. The fusion block combines swin transformers to capture global modeling relationships, and convolutional neural networks to extract local modeling details. It is integrated into the encoder-decoder structure, allowing the model to focus on both local and global texture structural information. An improved swin block is also introduced into the network to improve robustness by extracting more significant features. HCTSpeckle was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively with clinical objectives using two public and two private datasets. Both results showed that HCTSpeckle significantly enhanced the ultrasound image quality and outperformed state-of-the-art methods in noise reduction and structure preservation across all four datasets. Compared to existing denoising methods, HCTSpeckle achieved notably faster performance in terms of complexity comparison, such as parameter counts, gigaFLOPs, and inference time. Moreover, this study assessed the effectiveness of HCTSpeckle for alveolar bone segmentation using dental images, demonstrating that HCTSpeckle significantly improved segmentation performance. Furthermore, an experienced radiologist blindly rated the 250 dental US images on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest image quality, showing that HCTSpeckle consistently produced higher-quality images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it