Differentiable-Optimization Based Neural Policy for Occlusion-Aware Target Tracking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a learned probabilistic neural policy for safe, occlusion-free target tracking. The core novelty of our work stems from the structure of our policy network that combines generative modeling based on Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) with differentiable optimization layers. The weights of the CVAE network and the parameters of the differentiable optimization can be learned in an end-to-end fashion through demonstration trajectories. We improve the state-of-the-art (SOTA) in the following respects. We show that our learned policy outperforms existing SOTA in terms of occlusion/collision avoidance capabilities and computation time. Second, we present an extensive ablation showing how different components of our learning pipeline contribute to the overall tracking task. We also demonstrate the real-time performance of our approach on resource-constrained hardware such as NVIDIA Jetson TX2. Finally, our learned policy can also be viewed as a reactive planner for navigation in highly cluttered environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it