MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404312157 · doi:10.1103/8sbs-t24w

The Product Structure of Matrix Product States under Permutations

2025· preprint· en· W4404312157 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marta Florido-Llinàs, Álvaro M. Alhambra, Rahul Trivedi, Norbert Schuch, David Pérez-Garcı́a, J. I. Cirac

Bibliographic record

VenuePRX Quantum · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónGovernment of CanadaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónInternational Max Planck Research School for Quantum Science and TechnologyAustrian Science FundEuropean CommissionInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)CombinatoricsMathematicsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tensor network methods have proved to be highly effective in addressing a wide variety of physical scenarios, including those lacking an intrinsic one-dimensional geometry. In such contexts, it is possible for the problem to exhibit a weak form of permutational symmetry, in the sense that entanglement behaves similarly across any arbitrary bipartition. In this paper, we show that translationally-invariant (TI) matrix product states (MPSs) with this property are trivial, meaning that they are either product states or superpositions of a few of them. The results also apply to non-TI generic MPSs, as well as further relevant examples of MPSs including the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>W</a:mi> </a:math> state and the Dicke states in an approximate sense. Our findings motivate the usage of Ansätze simpler than tensor networks in systems whose structure is invariant under permutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRX QuantumSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207