MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404317214 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2024.3497758

Multirate FCS-MPC for Parallel Dual-Converter-Fed PMSM Drives With Reduced Circulating Currents

2024· article· en· W4404317214 on OpenAlexaff
Xuesong Wu, Cheng Xue, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersControl theory (sociology)Dual (grammatical number)Synchronous motorCurrent (fluid)VoltageComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When implementing finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) schemes in parallel converters sharing a common dc link, circulating currents become prominent due to the relatively low switching frequency. Although the multirate technique was proposed later to enhance the calculation efficiency, it is complex in parallel converters due to the numerous switching states and strong coupling between control variables. This article presents a multirate FCS-MPC method for permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) drives fed by parallel converters. Reduced circulating currents are achieved from two primary aspects. First, the equivalent multilevel model of parallel converters is integrated with a multirate structure. This fully utilizes the redundancy in switching states, thus simplifying the calculation and enabling a higher equivalent control frequency. Second, the regulation of circulating currents is decoupled from the motor-side variables, allowing for precise regulation of circulating current and easy design of cost functions. In contrast to conventional modulation-based schemes, the proposed scheme ensures superior stator current performance and fast dynamic response under all operating conditions. The effectiveness of the proposed method was validated through experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207