Trabecular bone structural units and their cement lines change with age, bone volume fraction, structure, and strength in female human vertebrae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A lifetime of successive bone remodeling events leads to trabeculae which are composed of a patchwork of bone structural units (BSUs) called hemi-osteons or trabecular packets. Traditionally, only intact surface BSUs have been studied, which are those that have been created most recently. Accordingly, the complex changes in the size and distribution of BSU throughout the trabeculae have been overlooked. In this study, the BSUs within the trabeculae of the second lumbar vertebrae were manually traced, using ImageJ software, in osteopontin immunostained sections of eight young women (aged 19-38 yr) and eight older women (aged 69-96 yr). A series of BSU profile properties including area, width, length, and perimeter were quantified, along with properties of each trabecular profile such as the number of BSU and cement line length. The relationships between these properties and age, as well as selected trabecular microstructural properties assessed with microcomputed tomography, and bone strength assessed on the neighboring third lumbar vertebrae, were investigated. The median BSU profile length and perimeter decreased with age, while the median BSU profile area and width was unchanged. Moreover, age was associated with an increase in the number of BSU profiles and cement line length per trabecular profile area. However, changes in BSU profile geometry, the number of BSU profiles, and the cement line length per trabecular profile were strongly correlated with trabecular bone volume fraction, structure model index, and bone strength. Further research is needed to understand how these changes in BSU properties affect the mechanical and failure properties of trabecular bone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".