MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404319701 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103518

Analysis of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>DESI</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>DES</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> using the Lagrangian effective theory of LSS

2024· article· lv· W4404319701 on OpenAlexaff
S. Chen, Joseph DeRose, Rongpu Zhou, Martin White, Simone Ferraro, Chris Blake, J. Lange, Risa H. Wechsler, José Edgar Madriz Aguilar, S. P. Ahlen, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, Kyle Dawson, Axel de la Macorra, P. Doel, Andreu Font-Ribera, E. Gaztañaga, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, Klaus Honscheid, Cullan Howlett, R. Kehoe, D. Kirkby, Theodore Kisner, Martin Landriau, L. Le Guillou, Marc Manera, Aaron Meisner, R. Miquel, Jeffrey A. Newman, Gustavo Niz, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Will J. Percival, Francisco Prada, Graziano Rossi, E. Sánchez, David J. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, D. Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, Benjamin Alan Weaver

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryHigh Energy PhysicsDivision of Astronomical SciencesNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilJet Propulsion LaboratoryOffice of ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterGordon and Betty Moore FoundationInstitute for Advanced StudyHeising-Simons FoundationMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper combines galaxy data targeted with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) with the associated galaxy lensing signal from the Year-3 Dark Energy Survey. The modeling implements novel effective and hybrid effective field theory aspects, independently confirming previous Cosmic Microwave Background results on the amplitude of the lensing signal, S8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall BuildingsFrench-language works237,207