MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404319701 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103518

Analysis of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>DESI</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>DES</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> using the Lagrangian effective theory of LSS

2024· article· lv· W4404319701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryHigh Energy PhysicsDivision of Astronomical SciencesNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilJet Propulsion LaboratoryOffice of ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterGordon and Betty Moore FoundationInstitute for Advanced StudyHeising-Simons FoundationMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper combines galaxy data targeted with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) with the associated galaxy lensing signal from the Year-3 Dark Energy Survey. The modeling implements novel effective and hybrid effective field theory aspects, independently confirming previous Cosmic Microwave Background results on the amplitude of the lensing signal, S8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it